I am a nihilist re research!
Yet another ignorantly promulgated research: fast walkers / exercisers live longer than slower ones.
Yet another ignorantly promulgated research: fast walkers / exercisers live longer than slower ones.
Congratulations researchers!
How many sick - some very sick people are told by doctors
to go for a walk? Do they not self - select themselves to earlier long term
repose?
How many older people inately walk slowly for similar
reasons? And similar resultant earlier deaths.
Essentially all research is almost certainly
deeply flawed or fraudulent because the researchers are only interested
in justifying the guitless pocketing the money instead of admitting they have
been wasting their time and the sponsor's money!
It is so sad that studies involve those who either do not
have the acuity, acumen or moral turpitude to carry out research which is always
far too expensive to do properly. There is much evidence for this apparently
unilateral claim. 'Climate lunacy research' is an example in another fraudulent realm
Contemplate the current fuss about brain cancer and mobile
phones. The 16 researchers have finished their rant. Everyone will ignore it -
and no one will remember understand or care that 99% of experts do not support the group of 16 - no
matter how many letters they have after their name!
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
How about the below for your
info?
How about making optuse, non - proven comparison
with tobacco and asbestos?
I feel sorry for so - called experts ranting about their
'discovery' of the latest cancer scare of mobile phone use.
It must be tough to contemplate that their information as
reported is always / unashamedly couched with the classical modifiers such as
might, could, possibly etc.
Then they re - use the old scam /
alternative medicine - term of ''free radicals damaging the DNA,
heart, brain, liver and hormone production.''
Maybe they should use the Rohrshah inkblot test -STATS: Rorschach For Dummies and keep looking closely at
the inkblots until proof is seen by all?
Accusing newspapers of publishing ''technical errors and
misleading statements.'' is not beyond them either. Why not imply a clear
conspiracy?
Or compare it all with the left's favourite shibboleth of
magnetic power lines' danger?
All has failed because they are reduced to re - using the
old scam /weasel word / idea of alternative medicine. The term of ''free
radicals damaging the DNA, heart, brain, liver and hormone production.'' is
classical broadcasted ineptitude.
How about making optuse, non - proven comparison with
tobacco and asbestos? Why do they not mention an equally irrelevant, strained
reference about Thalidemine?
Contemplate how delusionary the 16 co - authors will feel
when not a single intelligent parent will even bother telling their children
about not to use mobile phones.
Certainly history will not be kind to reseachers raving
about ''non - ionising radiation.
Soon it will be forgotten - until the next wasted lifetime
research hits us!
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
No comments:
Post a Comment